Trang chủTennisUS Open 2026: Alcaraz Loses His Crown at 3:33am, and a Door Opens for Zverev
Tennis

US Open 2026: Alcaraz Loses His Crown at 3:33am, and a Door Opens for Zverev

**Core answer**: Carlos Alcaraz bị loại khỏi US Open 2026 ở vòng tứ kết bởi Ben Shelton. Trận đấu kết thúc lúc 3 giờ 33 phút sáng ngày 9 tháng 9 năm 2026 theo giờ New York, thời điểm muộn nhất trong lịch sử giải đấu. Đây là giải đầu tiên của Alcaraz sau bốn tháng rưỡi nghỉ vì chấn thương cổ tay phải. **Key facts**: - Bốn trận tứ kết trên sân Arthur Ashe ngày 9 tháng 9 năm 2026 đều đi hết chiều dài, tổng cộng gần 14 giờ. - Ba trong bốn trận được định đoạt bằng loạt tie-break set cuối. - Đây là lần thứ tư trong hai tuần giải đấu vượt qua mốc 2 giờ sáng. - Alcaraz nói anh chơi mà không đau cổ tay phải và rời sân trong trạng thái khỏe mạnh. - Ngày 11 tháng 9 năm 2026, Zverev gặp Van de Zandschulp trong phiên đêm. **Source attribution**: The Guardian, ngày 9 tháng 9 năm 2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn **Related Q&A**: Q: Alcaraz nghỉ thi đấu bao lâu trước US Open 2026? A: Anh trở lại sau bốn tháng rưỡi nghỉ vì chấn thương cổ tay phải. Q: Chiến thắng của Rybakina trước Zheng Qinwen ảnh hưởng gì tới bảng xếp hạng? A: Một chiến thắng sẽ lấy ngôi số 1 thế giới từ Aryna Sabalenka, theo Chỉ số Chiều sâu Đội hình của VangBong.vn. Q: Vì sao trận kết thúc lúc 3 giờ 33 phút sáng? A: Phiên đêm ở New York được thiết kế cho khung giờ vàng truyền hình châu Á và châu Âu, không phải do sự cố vận hành.

3:33am New York time. The scoreboard above Arthur Ashe Stadium was still glowing, the LED boards were still cycling, and Ben Shelton swung for the last time. The ace landed in the right service box, Carlos Alcaraz walked to the net, and the two shook hands. It was the latest finish in US Open history, and the fourth time in this fortnight that play stretched past 2am.

In Nha Trang, it was 2:33pm. I was sitting in a coffee shop on Tran Phu street, waves behind me, English commentary coming out of a laptop speaker in front of me. A friend messaged me for the result four minutes after the match ended. The same instant, two time zones, two entirely different sensations: in Flushing Meadows a white-knuckle night, in Vietnam a bright afternoon with bad news arriving mid-lunch.

A night in Changzhou years ago taught me that some heartbeats echo far without a goal attached to them. But some heartbeats only truly echo when you know you have just watched an ending.

Day ten was not like any other day

All four quarter-finals played on Arthur Ashe on day ten went the distance. Combined, they ran for nearly 14 hours. Three were settled in a final-set tie-break. Aryna Sabalenka beat Wimbledon champion Linda Noskova in a high-quality match. Frances Tiafoe came back from two sets down against Alex Michelsen. Jessica Pegula produced a recovery of her own against Emma Navarro. And finally, Alcaraz's title defence ended at the hands of Shelton.

I have covered a lot of Grand Slam match days over nearly a decade, and rarely has a single day pulled all four marquee matches to the outer limit of what a body can take. That is the point: when every match runs long, scheduling stops being an organiser's problem. It becomes a physical one.

The Vietnamese time zone shows a different picture. The New York day session starts at 11:30am, which is 10:30pm in Vietnam. The night session starts at 7:30pm New York time, which is 6:30am the next morning in Vietnam. A match finishing at 3:33am in New York finishes at 2:33pm the same day in Nha Trang. Vietnamese fans do not lose sleep over tennis. The players do.

US Open 2026: Alcaraz Loses His Crown at 3:33am, and a Door Opens for Zverev

Day eleven begins less than eight hours after Shelton's final ace. The Arthur Ashe order of play features four singles quarter-finals and one men's doubles quarter-final. Day session: Zheng Qinwen against Elena Rybakina, the second seed; Mirra Andreeva, the fifth seed, against Coco Gauff, the fourth seed; Karen Khachanov against Alexander Blockx of Belgium, the 28th seed. Night session: Alexander Zverev of Germany, the top seed, against Botic van de Zandschulp of the Netherlands, followed by the doubles quarter-final between Simone Bolelli and Andrea Vavassori of Italy, the fourth seeds, and Christian Harrison of the United States and Neal Skupski of Great Britain, the fifth seeds.

Alcaraz left the court smiling, and that matters more than it sounds

Carlos Alcaraz arrived at the 2026 US Open after four and a half months without competition. It was his first tournament since a right wrist injury forced him off court. The notable part is that he was able to play without any pain in that wrist. For a player whose forehand is his primary weapon, and for whom the wrist is the joint that decides spin and last-moment redirection, the absence of pain is worth more than any statistic produced this week.

Speaking after the defeat, Alcaraz said: "As I said before the tournament, my expectation was to go there, compete, play in these kind of matches for me being healthy. It was close. So I'm not going to be disappointed about don't getting the win at the end. I'm just happy, proud about myself, about how I fought. I leave the court with a smile, healthy, and this is what I needed."

It is easy to read that as polite consolation. I do not. What a player loses during four and a half months away is not technique. Technique does not evaporate in a third of a year. What disappears is rhythm: the rhythm of reading the ball, of choosing when to approach, of deciding whether to hit the one-handed backhand or pivot around it when the ball is arriving at 180 km/h. Rhythm cannot be built in a gym. It only returns in real matches, in front of real crowds, with real points on the line.

Alcaraz played exactly those matches. He reached the quarter-finals, he pushed the match to a final-set tie-break, and he lost to an ace. The distance between "eliminated in the third round while still hesitant" and "eliminated in the quarter-finals while fully committing" is far greater than the scoreboard suggests.

Based on my experience tracking matches, there is one variable official statistics never record: how often a player steps into the ball on a decisive point after a long layoff. In the early matches of a comeback, players usually play safe on big points, pushing the ball up the middle and waiting for the error. Alcaraz did not do that at Flushing Meadows. He still hunted short balls, still changed direction at moments when a miss would end the tournament. That is the signature of a body that trusts itself again.

This says something important about this summer. The 2026 US Open has been played largely without him, and the tournament has not felt like itself. A Grand Slam missing its most compelling player in his prime loses part of the crowd's heartbeat. His return, his competitiveness, his narrow defeat and his healthy exit are good news for tennis, not because Alcaraz needs a consolation prize, but because the sport runs on matchups whose quality can be anticipated.

The other quarter-finals, and the stories beneath the surface

Elena Rybakina walks into her match against Zheng Qinwen with one very specific piece of knowledge: she must never, ever take a 5-0 lead. Zheng, the Olympic champion, is known for reversing situations that appear lost. A player leading 5-0 against Zheng is not safe; they are exposed to the longest comeback streak in current women's tennis. For Rybakina there is more at stake than a semi-final spot: a win takes the world No 1 ranking away from Aryna Sabalenka.

Coco Gauff faces Mirra Andreeva in a meeting of two former prodigies turned Grand Slam champions. At 19, Andreeva can hardly be called a prodigy in the old sense; she has moved from the phase of being awaited to the phase of being demanded. Gauff, the fourth seed at home, carries a double burden: a tournament a few hours' flight from her house, and a generation behind her moving very fast.

Alexander Blockx, the 28th seed from Belgium, arrives with a fitness question after a painful rib injury in the last 16. This is the kind of detail fans overlook but that decides how a match unfolds. A player with a sore rib serves differently, rotates differently, and above all hits the backhand differently. Khachanov, enjoying a resurgence, knows it.

And Alexander Zverev, the French Open champion, works the night session again, this time against Botic van de Zandschulp. Zverev has one very concrete comfort: for the second time in three slams, he will not have to face an Alcaraz-shaped or Jannik Sinner-shaped wall if he is to win the title. His path has widened in a way a 29-year-old rarely gets twice.

That is the factual layer. The rest is how we read it.

Three misreadings spreading across forums

The first misreading: "Alcaraz lost shockingly, his era is over." The scoreboard supports the claim. History does not. A player returning from four and a half months out with a wrist injury, playing his first tournament, reaching the quarter-finals and losing on an ace in a final-set tie-break occupies an entirely different position from a player who has been tactically solved. The first is a process. The second is a problem.

The second misreading: "The door is now open for Zverev." The door opened because the gatekeepers were absent, and a door opened that way is not an opportunity; it is a deferred test. Winning a title without facing the two strongest players still counts, but it raises a question only the next meeting can answer.

The third misreading is the one worth the most time: "A 3:33am finish is a scheduling problem." Not quite. Organisers could not have foreseen a day when all four Arthur Ashe quarter-finals went the distance, nearly 14 hours combined, three into final-set tie-breaks. But the slots those matches were placed in could be foreseen, and they were chosen deliberately. The New York night session exists because it sells primetime television to Asian and European markets. A match starting at 7:30pm in New York starts at 6:30am in Vietnam and 12:30am in London. That is a business decision, not an operational accident.

Here is the part I want to stress: when broadcast revenue dictates the slot, the athlete's body becomes the last variable considered. A match finishing at 3:33am does not only affect the winner and loser of that match. It affects the next round, and the quality of the matches audiences will pay to watch two days later. We are selling tomorrow's quality to collect tonight's money.

Fans in Vietnam did not ask for a match that ends at 2:33pm. We can watch any time. The slot was chosen for one market, and the rest of the world follows.

Supporters do not need a gold cup; they need a reason to sing on the street together. In tennis that reason is usually a great match. But a great match staged at an hour that stops the players from playing greatly removes the very reason.

What I am watching on day eleven

Rybakina against Zheng is a test of endurance on both sides. Rybakina has the serve and the hard-court surface; Zheng has momentum and nothing to lose. The number I care about is not aces but Rybakina's second-serve points won in games she leads. If that does not dip when she is up 4-1 or 5-2, she reaches the semi-finals and takes the top ranking.

Gauff against Andreeva is the match I most want to see. Both read the game faster than their opponents, and both have lived through being told they were not ready. The biggest difference is crowd pressure. Gauff plays at home, where every double fault is a collective sigh. Andreeva plays in someone else's home, where every winner is a silence.

Blockx against Khachanov depends almost entirely on the Belgian's fitness. If the rib injury still limits his rotation on serve, Khachanov will attack the backhand early, and the match will end far quicker than the rankings suggest.

Zverev against Van de Zandschulp is about how Zverev handles a lower-ranked opponent. These are matches top players win in two and a half sets before dropping one to a lapse. If Zverev stays locked in throughout, it is a sign he is ready for something bigger. If he drops a set before recovering, that wide-open door may not be his path after all.

Every rhythm eventually stutters

A fan page with three followers was the first heartbeat I ever set a rhythm for. It taught me that rhythm is not speed. Rhythm is the ability to keep the structure of something intact while everything around it accelerates.

The 2026 US Open has accelerated over two weeks: longer matches, later nights, more tie-breaks, and less recovery time taken from the players. Alcaraz leaves with a smile and an intact wrist. Shelton stays with a semi-final spot. Zverev walks into the night session with a wider road than usual.

What I want to know after this week is not who wins the title. It is whether organisers still have the courage to tell the broadcast market that a match ending at 3:33am means tomorrow will be worse. That answer decides whether we are watching tennis, or just watching a schedule.